The Importance of Software Escrow Under MAS Regulations
The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) has reinforced the importance of software escrow agreements in its Technology Risk Management Guidelines (2021). As financial institutions (FIs) increasingly depend on third-party software solutions, ensuring operational resilience and cybersecurity compliance is more critical than ever.
This guide explains why software escrow is essential, how it aligns with MAS regulations, and the best practices for financial institutions in Singapore.
Why MAS Requires Software Escrow for Financial Institutions
With the rise of Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) models, financial institutions rely heavily on external software vendors for their operations. However, these dependencies also introduce significant risks, such as:
- Vendor insolvency or bankruptcy, leaving institutions without access to critical software
- Service disruptions that affect business continuity and operational efficiency
- Cybersecurity threats, including exposure to data breaches and ransomware
To mitigate these risks, MAS recommends that FIs implement software escrow agreements that provide access to source code and ensure recoverability in case of vendor failure.
Regulatory Requirements for Software Escrow in MAS Guidelines
In Section 5.3.4 of the MAS Technology Risk Management Guidelines (2021), MAS states:
“The FI should assess if a source code escrow agreement should be in place, based on the criticality of the acquired software to the FI’s business, so that the FI can have access to the source code in the event that the vendor is unable to support the FI.” – Monetary Authority of Singapore
This requirement highlights the regulatory expectation that financial institutions must plan for vendor-related disruptions and maintain full control over their IT infrastructure.
Key Benefits of Software Escrow for MAS Compliance
- Regulatory Compliance – Meets MAS requirements for risk management and business continuity
- Operational Continuity – Ensures access to critical software even if a vendor fails
- Cybersecurity Resilience – Protects against data loss, security vulnerabilities, and ransomware
- SaaS Protection – Ensures continued access to cloud-hosted applications
Steps to Implement Software Escrow for Compliance
Financial institutions must take proactive steps to ensure compliance with MAS guidelines. The following steps provide a structured approach:
- Assess Software Criticality – Identify mission-critical software that requires an escrow agreement
- Choose a Trusted Escrow Provider – Work with MAS-compliant software escrow service providers
- Define Verification Processes – Regularly test deposited source code for completeness and functionality
- Conduct Penetration Testing – Ensure cybersecurity measures align with MAS’s security framework
- Review Compliance Annually – Update agreements as regulations and business needs evolve
Best Practices for Verifying Software Escrow Deposits
MAS emphasizes the need to verify escrow deposits to ensure recoverability. Best practices include:
- Automated Code Compilation Tests – Ensuring the deposited code can be compiled and deployed
- Third-Party Security Audits – Conducting penetration testing and vulnerability assessments
- Regular Compliance Reviews – Ensuring alignment with MAS regulatory requirements
Conclusion: Financial Institutions Must Implement Software Escrow for Compliance
With the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) mandating software escrow, financial institutions must take urgent steps to ensure compliance. Failure to implement escrow solutions can lead to operational disruptions, cybersecurity risks, and regulatory penalties.
By following best practices, leveraging verified escrow services, and ensuring ongoing compliance, financial institutions can secure their IT infrastructure, mitigate risks, and align with MAS’s cybersecurity expectations.



